Rethinking development in Tonga: dialogues with Sefita Hao’uli,vKalafi Moala, and Melino Maka
- Description:
- Acknowledging the work of the late Tongan professors, Futa Helu and Epeli Hau’ofa, this is the first in a series of four articles. Teena Brown Pulu revisits Helu’s criticism of development in Tonga by framing interview conversations with Sefita Hao’uli, Kalafi Moala and Melino Maka in a Hau’ofa-styled narrative that draws on satire and tongue-in-cheek prodding as a form of criticism. This is To...
- Display date:
- 2013-12-17
- Location:
- Tonga
- Format:
- Journal article
- Collections:
- Tuwhera
- Publisher:
- Te Ara Poutama, Auckland University of Technology
- Content partner:
- Auckland University of Technology
- Availability:
- Not specified
-
Copyright status: All rights reservedFind out more about what you are able to do with this itemThis item is all rights reserved, with means you'll have to get permission from Auckland University of Technology before using it. For more information, please see our use and reuse page.
More informationAuckland University of Technology has this to say about the rights status of this item:Te Kaharoa is a free-access, multi-disciplinary, refereed, e-journal focusing on indigenous Pacific issues.
What can I do with this item?
Non-infringing useNZ copyright law does not prevent every use of a copyright work, and this item may be hosted by an international institute or organisation. You should consider what you can and cannot do with a copyright work.
No sharingYou may not copy and/or share this item with others without further permission. This includes posting it on your blog, using it in a presentation, or any other public use.
No modifyingYou are not allowed to adapt or remix this item into any other works.
No commercial useYou may not use this item commercially.
Related items
Welcome and warm Pasifik greetings
The information on this site has been gathered from our content partners.
The names, terms, and labels that we present on the site may contain images or voices of deceased persons and may also reflect the bias, norms, and perspective of the period of time in which they were created. We accept that these may not be appropriate today.
If you have any concerns or questions about an item, please contact us.